I am so tired of seeing statements like these:
- Nutrition is not taught in medical school.
- Pain management is not taught in medical school.
- Practice management is not taught in medical school.
All three of those statements, and the vast majority of others bemoaning the shortcomings of medical education just because “XYZ isn’t taught in medical school” are right, but oh so wrong.
“Nutrition” is not taught in medical school. What we learn is biochemistry, metabolism, gastrointestinal and endocrine anatomy and physiology. We may not learn “nutrition” per se, but we learn what we need to know to understand nutrition in a more fundamental and comprehensive way than can be gleaned from any course in “nutrition”. This also means we understand nutrition differently — and more completely — than anyone without that same level of medical education can, however much they’ve read about nutrition.
“Pain management” is not taught in medical school. What we learn is neuroanatomy, pharmacology, behavioral psychology, and neurophysiology, so that we have the basic knowledge to understand pain management. Narcotics dosing, epidural steroid injection techniques, rehab protocols and so on are learned in residency. I agree that pain is often not well managed, but not because “it’s not taught in medical school.”
Practice management is not taught in medical school. Why should it? Not every doctor is going to have to manage a practice. Many of them are going to become employees. Should everyone leave medical school knowing how to read an employment contract? Well, yes, but is medical school really the right place to learn that? How about the basics of money management and investing? You should have learned that around the kitchen table from your parents before you started high school. That’s not what medical school is for.
Medical school is where you learn the basics about the human body, its structure and function in health and disease, and the disease processes that afflict it. You learn about the microorganisms that make people ill and the drugs that make them well. And that’s just the first two years. The second two years is when you put those basics to work at the bedside, discovering what all those things you learned the first two years look like in real life. Hopefully by the time you’ve gone through those four years, you’ve decided what kind of physician you want to be, so you can move on to postgraduate (residency) training, where you learn how to do what you need to do. Almost all of the knowledge and skills physicians use in day-to-day practice are learned in residency, not medical school. That’s where a surgeon learns to surge, where OBGs learn to deliver, and where family docs learn everything. Even after training is completed, there’s Continuing Medical Education to help us keep up to date. (There’a also UpToDate.)
Family doctors, internists, pediatricians and all other primary care doctors need training in nutrition. Surgeons, hospitalists, oncologists, and all doctors who take care of sick people need training in pain management. Everyone needs to understand the basics of running a business, including the underlying principle of receiving payment for providing professional services. But medical school is not where these things need to be taught.
Doctors also need to know how to respect others, how to manage their time, even how to wash their hands. Ideally they should know these things long before medical school. If not, they shouldn’t be accepted in the first place.
Most of the hue and cry about alleged med school deficiencies is really a set of straw man arguments made by non-physicians trying to demean medical education because “doctors aren’t taught about this,” whatever it is they’re selling. Don’t but it. By the time you see a doctor, he knows what he needs to know in order to figure out what’s wrong with you and what to do about it. If not, any deficiencies are not because of things “not taught in medical school”.

QED: Medical school curriculum is fine how it is and there is no need to adjust what is taught there for today and tomorrow’s physicians.
By: kt5 on January 16, 2012
at 4:02 pm
Sounds great re: nutrition in theory, but if it were true, then more doctors would actually demonstrate a basic grasp of nutrition.
Just think how much deeper an understanding of nutrition physicians could have if they actually were required to take an actual nutrition course, allowing them to synthesize that which they learned in their biochem etcetera courses specifically related to nutrition. Doctors would then be uniquely positioned to parse nutrition from this framework.
Not every med student is as bright as you are, and neither is every doctor. Even a weeklong nutrition overview would do so much to help the future doctors, whose lifestyle during medical school often dictates that they’re not cooking their own meals at home or making healthful decisions for what they jam into their maw. Heck, couch it as a cooking class and make it recreational while weaving in actual nutrition nuggets. That class might be the only time they actually cook for themselves until after their residency!
By: ANP on January 16, 2012
at 5:55 pm
To ANP: What does “a basic grasp of nutrition” entail, exactly?
What does this elusive body of information consist of? As a young physician in training, I feel quite confident telling patients to eat a large variety of lightly processed foods, that if something comes in a box, bag, or can, it’s probably not as good for you as something you have to wash dirt off, and that to live healthy lives into our old age, we need to achieve the same level of physical activity that our ancestors did. I am also confident telling patients that if they eat nutritious food that is relatively calorie-poor, they are unlikely to need supplements; and that the supplement industry sells a lot of snake oil.
I’m not entirely sure what other information I’m missing for my role as a family doc, that I didn’t get from not doing an extra degree in nutrition. As a reasonably intelligent person, I find carb and calorie counting exhausting. I think it’s reasonable to assume that the vast majority of my patients will too, and simply won’t.
My job as a physician is to meet patients where they are, and help them make good choices. And frankly, the prescriptive, punitive model of modern nutrition science is often NOT helpful in my day-to-day practice.
Frankly, I’m glad I wasn’t forced to learn a large amount of rules about nutrition in medical school, because, frankly, it wouldn’t be helpful (and also much of it would already be obsolete). And when I have a patient for whom my nutritional coaching isn’t sufficient, I send them to someone who actually has the knowledge to take care of them; a nutritionist.
It is nonsense to assume that physicians can do everything or know everything. In the case of nutrition, we have a large body of knowledge of the physiology, biochemistry, and anatomy of nutrition. Which allows us to approach nutrition with common-sense, and to know when we need the advice of experts.
What more do you want from us?
Now, I would argue that the problem lies more in the kinds of minds that are getting admitted to medical school…that the kind of mind that is capable and flexible enough to synthesize and integrate all the factoids learned in medical school is less likely to get admitted to medical school in today’s admission climate. That the global thinkers and generalists are getting shut out in favour of the rigid linear thinkers…but that’s another blog topic for another day.
BB
By: Beach Bum on January 16, 2012
at 8:30 pm
I am a fat, but well controlled, type 2 diabetic. I’m also a CNM, so I do know a bit about nutrition. However, I have a problem. Lose weight, my doctor [correctly] says, and passes me to a dietician who gives me the standard diet, which, given the oral meds I’m on, leads to up to 5 hypoglycemic attacks per day [occasionally when driving which is VERY scary]
The dietician does not know how to change my medication–nor should she. My endo, and my family doctor, do not want to get involved in dietetic issues.
And I am either uncontrolled, or hypoglycemic. This game of “pass the hot potato” [well, that might not be the best vegetable in this case] has been going on for a decade. Sometimes it seems that everyone is a specialist, and the patient becomes a patchwork of different conditions with no one looking at the whole person.
By: Antigonos CNM on January 17, 2012
at 9:25 am
Once again, dino, you have nailed it. The cry of the nostrum seller IS “they don’t teach that in medical school.” Except when it’s “doctors/pharma/the government/baddie of choice DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT THIS’ about whatever they’re selling.
By: mamadoc on January 17, 2012
at 9:47 pm
Great stuff! I found your site from searching online, and it is really cool! I am currently pursing the medical field asd a career. I want to become a surgeon.
I have started a new medical blog here: http://www.studenttosurgeon.wordpress.com
By: Brandon on January 19, 2012
at 3:26 pm
I really do feel–and I majored in biochemistry as an undergrad and graduated with honors from medical school and am board certified in internal medicine–that our training in nutrition was lacking.
I could manage TPN and treat fluid and electrolyte disturbances, diagnose B-12 deficiency, iron deficiency, hemochromatosis and so on. But could I offer real, sound, and helpful advice to the obese patient who asked how she should be eating?
I really couldn’t, other than the vague advice to eat less and exercise more, and offer her a consultation with a dietician that her insurance company wouldn’t pay for.
It wasn’t until I developed impaired glucose tolerance, obesity, hypertension and had to lose weight myself that I learned about the proper macronutrient composition of diets (and how little we actually know about what is best) and even how to estimate people’s caloric requirements.
It wasn’t until I became a runner that I learned about various types of exercise and how they related to metabolism and caloric requirements. It wasn’t until I added resistance training and cross-training to my regimen that I learned of the benefits of these types of exercise on injury-prevention and weight management.
Looking back, I wish they had included a short course on diet and exercise back in medical school. At least it would have familiarized me with the literature and the various methods used to study such things.
By: James Wilk on January 29, 2012
at 11:19 am